Jakarta, Akuratnews.com – New information ended up discovered by the defendant Pinangki Sirna Malasari. The former prosecutor admitted that he educated Djoko Tjandra’s whereabouts in Malaysia to the Directorate of Execution and Examination (Uheksi), the Legal professional General’s Business office (Kejagung).
This was conveyed by Pinangki in a abide by-up listening to on the agenda for the assessment of the accused in the circumstance of alleged bribery in the Supreme Court (MA) fatwa arrangement for Djoko Tjandra.
In the beginning, the KMS Roni General public Prosecutor (JPU) questioned Pinangki about reporting to the executing prosecutor relating to the whereabouts of Djoko Tjandra. Pinangki then admitted that he had documented the whereabouts of Djoko Tjandra. Pinangki described Djoko’s whereabouts to the Head of Uheksi, Aryo, in November 2019.
“You fully grasp that Djoko has to be executed. At that time you conveyed the facts about Djoko’s whereabouts, remember to execute it? Did you convey it to the executing prosecutor who taken care of the case in problem?” requested the prosecutor.
“I don’t know who is in cost of him. But I conveyed to the Head of Uheksi of the Ago, I even told him, ‘Pak Djoko has a good friend of mine named Aryo.’ And at that time Aryo mentioned that the Uheksi Directorate had certainly monitored Djoko’s whereabouts in Malaysia. , “replied Pinangki.
The notification, explained Pinangki, was also supported by proof in the type of photographs of the fugitive in the Lender Bali assert rights case.
“So I will explain to you that in November, I will display the photos to Aryo to the Head of Uheksi,” added Pinangki.
He stated that the supply of information and facts about Djoko Tjandra to Aryo experienced been planned from the get started. This is due to the fact someone’s execution energy will have to go by means of the Uhection Directorate.
“That’s why I conveyed it to Aryo since it was the primary program, even if the execution was carried out, the execution had to go by him because I did not know who the execution commonly was via,” he said.
In this situation, Pinangki Sirna Malasari was billed with getting USD500,000 of the USD1,000,000 promised by Djoko Soegiarto Tjandra. The dollars was made use of to approach the MA fatwa by the Ago so that the imprisonment imposed on Djoko Tjandra was primarily based on the PK (Reconsideration) Conclusion Range 12 dated June 11, 2009 in connection with the case of transferring the appropriate to acquire (cessie) Financial institution Bali so that it could not be executed. So that Djoko Tjandra could return to Indonesia with out getting to bear a legal sentence.
The prosecutor also accused Pinangki of violating Write-up 5 paragraph 2 in conjunction with Report 5 paragraph 1 letter a of Law Selection 31 of 1999 as amended by Law Quantity 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Corruption (hereinafter referred to as the Corruption Act) subsidiary to Posting 11 of the Corruption Regulation .
Not only that, Pinangki was also charged with Article 3 of Law Selection 8 of 2010 regarding revenue laundering and was charged with criminal conspiracy in Posting 15 in conjunction with Write-up 5 paragraph 1 letter a of the subsidiary Corruption Legislation Post 15 in conjunction with Post 13 of the Corruption Act.